Horizon Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 In C++, it's common to use RAII types like std::lock_guard to manage synchronization primitives, ensuring a lock is acquired at object creation and released at destruction. However, a less common but useful pattern is the "anti-lock," which temporarily releases a lock and reacquires it later, useful in scenarios where you need to drop a lock while performing certain operations, like calling out to other components to avoid deadlocks. Temporarily Dropping a Lock: The Anti-lock Pattern by Raymond Chen From the article: There is a common pattern in C++ of using an RAII type to manage a synchronization primitive. There are different versions of this, but they all have the same basic pattern: Creating the object from a synchronization object: Locks the synchronization object. Destructing the object: Unlocks the synchronization object. These types go by various names, like std::lock_guard, std::unique_lock, or std::coped_lock, and specific libraries may have versions for their own types, such as C++/WinRT’s winrt::slim_lock_guard and WIL’s wil::rwlock_release_exclusive_scope_exit (which you thankfully never actually write out; just use auto). One thing that is missing from most standard libraries, however, is the anti-lock. The idea of the anti-lock is that it counteracts an active lock. View the full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.